This literature takes the form of pamphlets, posters, and the occasional small booklet. For my own sanity, I ought not look at these things. They're not as awful as I at first feared them to be - some folks obviously sprayed them with punctuation grapeshot, but that's about it and, sadly, that's far better than I've come to expect out of anything short of a professionally published book.*
Because I'm a well-adjusted adult, I have a favourite screwy public health poster. It hung there basking in the dubious glory of florescent lights for the first couple weeks I worked this route, then vanished into the ether. Yesterday heralded its triumphant return.
It's not a terrible sign, really. No stray apostrophes or extraneous quotation marks mar its visage, nor did any bright spark decide to use an obscure term just because it sounds cool. The only thing wrong with it is a syntax error - not even a technically wrong syntax error, as it still parses.
Holy carp, though, does it ever provide an example of why technically right isn't always practically right! Here's the part I'm talking about, which is printed quite large and bold in the middle of the poster:
"STI -
HPV
HIV
BRYAN WHYTE**
CLINICAL TESTING."
I really wonder what Bryan Whyte thinks of this. Has anyone told him he's apparently a severe STI? So many questions present themselves, and they could all be prevented by a simple rearrangement, such as putting "Bryan Whyte Clinical Testing" before the rest. Then again, the sign wouldn't be half so funny after that.
*A professionally published ink-and-paper book. Some seriously bizarre things slip through on e-books. I wonder if the editors actually put them there to mess with us or if they're just that careless in the electronic medium.
**You know the drill.
I can actually answer the ebooks question! Many ebook versions are older books are done via OCR (Optical Character Recognition), just scanning in the pages of an existing copy of the book and letting the computer figure out what the text is. This is especially entertaining to someone who reads a lot of high fantasy, has read many of the books before, and thus is prone to going "... that's not right". Truthfully, someone should freakin PROOFREAD the OCR read (I know if I ever use that software, I go through and proof because seriously it can mangle things to no end) but a lot of people don't.
ReplyDeleteThis is your Mel's Useless Tangent of the day.
You have the most interesting Useless Tangents, thus rendering them non-useless...and yeah, it really is kinda glaring sometimes.
Delete